Thoughts about a Passenger with an Invisible Disability

An invisible disability can be a very perplexing, and maybe even an uncomfortable topic for some people. For most people, when they think of the term “disability”, what comes to mind may be someone with a visible disability, in other words, an impediment they can see.  There are still some people that don’t realize there are disabilities that are invisible, or can’t be seen with the naked eye alone.  An invisible disability is exactly that, invisible. At the same time, just because someone has an invisible disability, doesn’t mean they aren’t in need of assistance accomplishing their goals.  Also, just because it isn’t clear that someone has a disability, doesn’t mean they aren’t in fact disabled.  Recently, I was made aware of a story about an airline passenger who has an invisible disability that had an incident trying to utilize an accommodation that was available to her.  Due to the nature of this story, it’s important to point out that the person with the disability knows what kind of assistance they need, and should be heard when they let people know how someone else can help them.  After all, the person with the disability lives with their disability everyday, and knows best how things affect them in their surroundings.  They also know how to get things done in the best way for them.

When we travel, we prearrange accommodations over the phone with our airline.  We don’t expect to have any issues once we get to the airport.  Vacations are a time to rest and relax from our daily lives and the stress that comes along with it.  It’s unfortunate that this incident occurred and, according to the passenger’s prior experiences mentioned in the article below, sadly this isn’t the first time it has happened. The fact that this incident happened is a reminder that continued efforts of increasing disability awareness need to be focused on by a variety of industries that have constant interaction with the public.

A blanket category of disability doesn’t exist.  This incident is an example of how a person’s situation doesn’t “fit” into what some people “think” disability is, or should be.  As a result, the passenger had to experience difficulties that weren’t necessary.  While more visible “cues” would probably make some people more easily able to cope with the situation, or situations similar to this, it’s currently not the case.  Additionally, given the advances in medical science and technology, it seems like the term “disability” may continue not to “fit” what people think it is, or should be.  That’s not a bad thing for the person or society.  After all, various advances in many fields have made positive impacts in the ability of people with disabilities to work, and have even improved their quality of life.  These are just a few examples of the positive things that have happened due to different innovations in society.

Unfortunately, until we all work together to feel more comfortable about the term “disability” and those it affects, in conjunction with not being afraid to be more inquisitive about the subject, it seems this will continually be a cycle that has no end.  More education and sensitivity training for workers in different industries would be a great starting point to break the ice for many people.  As a community, we are increasingly active with everyone else that lives, works, and plays in society.  These experiences, while certainly unfortunate, should be used for all as a tool for learning and growth.

Thanks for reading..

cr

 

Here’s the link to the article:

http://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/disabled-woman-stansted-airport-refuse-help-ryanair-nathalie-allport-grantham-a8138051.html

Law Enforcement’s New Disability Consideration..

Sometimes I use my posts to shed light on subjects that may not be considered relevant to disability as an issue but, could use some exposure in some way. This week, I wanted to shed some light on law enforcement and their treatment of people with disabilities. I know there’s a large push to increase disability sensitivity among law enforcement but this post is going to talk about something that’s reaching into a totally new dimension.

The issue I’m thinking about is totally different. It involves the split-second decisions a law enforcement officer had to make at a group home in Georgia that injured one of its residents. This is clearly a case of entering uncharted waters as it relates to law enforcement and their interactions with people who have a disability. I’m not sure if, or how law enforcement can act less aggressively when their primary job is to ensure the safety of the general public. In emergency situations faced by law enforcement on a regular basis and, as in this situation, I’m not sure how the ADA fits in.

Somehow, some people feel if there’s a suspect in a crime who has a disability, and that person’s disability isn’t considered in crisis or emergency situations, that’s a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is an attempt to “level the playing field” for those with disabilities on a daily basis. Once the situation has been deescalated, steps should be taken in accordance with the ADA to ensure things like effective communication, if the person has a hearing impairment, and access to the courthouse, if the person a mobility impairment, for example, are observed. These are just a few ways of how the ADA was meant to be utilized as it’s currently written. Quite honestly, I’m not sure if law enforcement has time to consider the ADA when you’re talking about life and death.

I’ll be interested to see what the Supreme Court decides. Maybe, instead of using part of the ADA to regulate this sort of situation, a new law should be drawn up in an effort to have a clearer framework available. I’m not saying the situation should be ignored, because it does need attention. It might just be that another avenue needs to be explored to have more effective action plan put in place.

Thanks for reading..

cr
For more information on this story check out the link below:
http://lubbockonline.com/filed-online/2015-03-21/supreme-court-considers-impact-disability-law-police-mentally-ill#.VQ4SleFGSSo